According to the Eco-Test, only five of 26 detergents contain no soluble plastic

Eco-Test tested 26 detergents for washing power, environmental friendliness and ingredients. The results surprise!

In a recent study, Eco-Test examined 26 detergents. It is positive that all detergents wash about equally well. However, there are also some that are harmful to the environment and especially to health. Among other things, the testers found soluble plastic and an ingredient that is potentially toxic to reproduction .

This is how the test went

For the test, Eco-Test examined 26 heavy-duty detergents , also known as universal detergents, for their washing performance, as they are suitable for all textiles and for white and heavily soiled fabrics. The detergents tested included private brands from drugstores and discounters such as dm or Aldi, popular brands such as Persil and Lenor, and ecological detergents from Sonett and Frosch.

To test how well the detergents remove soil, five different fabric samples were soiled with 15 different stains. Among other things, red wine, pens and make-up were used. The stains dried up for a week and were then washed. In addition, Öko-Test examined how much black and white T-shirts discolored.

The results of Öko-Test are surprising

  • Only five out of 26 detergents, including Sonett and Frosch, scored “good”.
  • The remaining 21 detergents were only rated “satisfactory” because they contained, among other things, synthetic polymers that get into the waste water during washing.
  • Only the ecological detergents Frosch and Sonett were fragrance-free
Öko-Test rated the washing performance of all detergents as “good”, even if they were not able to remove all stains. The Sonett detergent concentrate (1.8) for 23 cents per wash received the best overall rating . The overall winner is here >>
Frosch also did well in the overall assessment. No liquid microplastic was found in the two test winners.
Lenor 2in1 (28 cents) and Persil Universal Megaperls (30 cents), on the other hand, only received “satisfactory”. The testers criticized the plastic compounds, fragrances and optical brighteners in the product. In addition, the fabrics were slightly discolored.

Allergic reactions due to optical brighteners

Optical brighteners were found in 22 detergents. These make the laundry appear whiter than it is and do not assist in cleaning the laundry. The problem is that optical brighteners are difficult to degrade and can trigger allergic reactions on the skin.

Microplastics found in laundry detergent

Synthetic polymers made from petroleum have also been found in many detergents. These are not biodegradable. Another problem is that sewage treatment plants cannot completely filter out solid and liquid microplastics from the wastewater , so that they get into the water and also as sewage sludge onto the fields and into the air.

Reproductive toxic fragrance found

The testers found the fragrance Lilial in Fit’s “Sunil” detergent, which is suspected of having a negative effect on reproduction. The allergen is difficult to degrade and can pollute the environment.
Overall, all detergents, except Sonett’s, contained fragrances. However, these can cause allergies and are difficult to degrade in the environment. Allergy sufferers can recognize perfumed detergent by the inscriptions “Duftstoff”, “Parfum” and “Fragrance”.

Modular detergents are better for the environment

Öko-Test praised Sonett ‘s test-winning detergent because it is a so-called modular detergent . These contain neither softeners nor bleach, as these agents are often only needed for hard water and difficult stains. Consumers can add these substances separately. This not only saves chemicals, but also protects the environment and water.

Crystal Waston MD

Crystal Waston has a degree in Cross Media Production and Publishing. At vital.de she gives everyday tips and deals with topics related to women's health, sport, and nutrition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top